Tuesday, October 31, 2006
I was laughing hysterically when I read this. Read the talkbacks at then end of the artilce - super funny!
Male Birth Control - A Useless Invention
This caught my eye today. I do not understand why scientists waste their time researching a birth control pill for men. It won't work. Female birth control is very time sensitive and must be taken at around the same time everyday. Most women are very diligent about taking their birth control because they have a lot at stake and the odds are against them if they are lax about it. Although the male version might not be as time sensitive, men have little to lose (except 20% of their paycheck in some jurisdictions). In many cases a man can father a child and be totally unaware of the existence of his offspring. I can not imagine that men will want to take a pill everyday which most certainly will have ample side effects. Furthermore, there will be some (dumb) women out there who will rely on the men's diligence in taking the pill that they will neglect their own. Doctors already have a method in enabling male infertility - it's called a vasectomy. I say let the scientists find a cure for cancer and leave the birthcontrolling up to the women.
I am predicting that if a male birth control pill hits the market the birth rate in this country is going to spike.
I am predicting that if a male birth control pill hits the market the birth rate in this country is going to spike.
Monday, October 30, 2006
Finally Some Common Sense
I guess common sense still exists to some extent in the haredi community. Even though he has been in and out of the hospital in the past few months Rabbi Ovadia Yosef is still trying to infuse some sort of common sense in the haredi community. Here is what he said about mixed seating at social engagements.
I can only imagine what kind of uproar is happening in the ultra-orthodox communities around the globe. I would even dare to put money on people throwing out meat with the hechsher of Rabbi Yosef.
I can only imagine what kind of uproar is happening in the ultra-orthodox communities around the globe. I would even dare to put money on people throwing out meat with the hechsher of Rabbi Yosef.
Making a Prediction
November 10th will be the World Gay Pride Parade in Jerusalem. Since this is "take three" for this event I am making a prediction that something is going to happen on or before that date. The parade was initially scheduled for August of 2005, but the police felt that they would be stretched too thin between the ethnic cleansing of the Jews from Gaza and dealing with the homos in Jerusalem. It was then rescheduled for this summer, however, due to the War in Lebanon, the parade was postponed until November 10. Thus, my prediction is that the Power that Be does not want the promiscuity running amok on the holy streets of Jerusalem. Ergo my prediction that something will happen around November 10th!
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Losing Weight
I wonder if this really works. The debates in the health field are constant if sex really helps you loose weight. I am sure most people would rather have sex than jump on the treadmill. Yet, why are we all still so fat. Every other month another study comes out about how fat Amercians are. I guess we are just not having enough sex! Maybe I should add this to my workout regimen, I'll let ya'll know how it works out! JK! :)
Monday, October 16, 2006
Way too gay...
So, for the past week or so I was debating whether I should write on this subject or not. On one hand I don’t want to give these freaks another platform to spew their propaganda but on the other hand I am just sick and tired of hearing about it. Ok, let me back up.
Last Monday we got an email from the school telling us to go to this “minority” picnic sponsored by a prominent law firm in South Florida. This is what the email stated: “All minority students should take advantage of this opportunity, so I hope you will please spread the word to all black, Hispanic, women, Asian and students with disabilities, as well as any other minorities you can identify at (insert name of Law School here). Mind you, when the military has a recruiter anywhere on the 300+ acre campus, the law school hangs an enormous banner as well as large posters around the school stating that the law school doesn’t promote or endorse any employer who discriminates on the basis of race, religion and sexual orientation. (I need to find a document with the actual text, it’s really despicable). This is all based on the military’s don’t ask, don’t tell policy. Yet, they are promoting this minority picnic, which clearly discriminates against white males. Oh right, its not discrimination when white males are excluded because they had it good enough all these years. Hello??? This is South Florida; white males are the minority here.
Then there was Tuesday there was a table set up in school by the gay mafia all about the military’s policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” So of course I went to the table and told the fella's a few things that were on my mind. Number one “you lose credibility if you misrepresent the opposing party,” the policy is Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue. Of course that would ruin their bias and their argument. The second thing I told them is that if they aren’t going to join the military, why do they care whether or not gays can be flaming in the military or not. After all, there are many Sabbath observing Jews who will not work for a company who is not flexible in allowing their employees go home before sundown on Friday. If this is the case at a particular company, a Sabbath observor simply would not work there. Yet, it is rare that you see boycotts of those companies by Jewish groups. You don’t work in an environment that doesn’t suit your needs and comfort level. If you are a flame, don’t join the military. End of story! The third issue I pointed out to them is that the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy is for THEIR OWN protection. Since most of the country, especially those who serve in the military are men and women of faith who believe in God and believe in the passage in Leviticus 18:22: “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” Just as strongly the gay mafia believes in their message. The people of faith serving this country believe that God deems homosexuality as an abomination. Yet, it is only “insensitive” or “intolerant” for the military personnel to show any sort of ambivalence with homosexuals serving with them and completely permissible for the homosexual community to belittle and undermine the beliefs of the religious community (see Rosie O’Donnell’s 9/11 rant on The View).
On Wednesday I was informed that it was National Coming Out Day. Try as I might I could not find it on the U.N.’s calendar of all holidays under the sun. Thus, another email was sent out to all the students: “Lambda Law Society celebrates: National Coming Out Day! Today, October 11th Since 1987, October 11 has been National Coming Out Day, a day to promote awareness of the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered community. But Coming Out is not just an emotional process for the person coming out. It also affects those close to them. So for the first time in the history of National Coming Out Day, the Human Rights Campaign is offering the straight community a downloadable guide to Coming Out:"The guide walks people through the emotional spectrum that people typically feel after someone comes out to them, outlines myths and facts about GLBT people, and gives easy ways for straight people to learn more and demonstrate their support for GLBT Americans."” Do heterosexual's have "coming out" day? Or "coming in" day? Or any day?
On Friday, I received this email: Lambda Law Society, presents our October Social! Friday, October 13th, from 7:30 to 9:30 At the home of Prof. (name of professor)Drop by for a selection of adult and light beverages, as well as hors d'oeuvres. Again, I don’t subscribe to this organization. I have no interest in it. Keep my mailbox clean of this junk.
Today is Monday, lo and behold; guess what was in my inbox? Yup, another email from Lambda: Lambda Law Society presents Marriage & Family Equality
A Discussion with Prof. (same gay professor who hosted the social) Tuesday, October 17th, 4:15pm - 5:15pm Faculty Study; how do you feel about gay marriage? Gay adoption? Did you know that starting in the Anita Bryant era; Florida became the only state to expressly prohibit, in its statutes, gays from adopting? The United States Supreme Court's refusal to hear an appeal on the issue in 2005 has opened the door to more states instituting such bans. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of children are waiting for loving homes. Did you know that an anti-gay marriage coalition is close to getting the Florida Marriage Protection Amendment on the 2008 ballot? The Law Center's resident expert on these issues will lead a discussion on these hot topics, as we head into what is becoming an interesting state and national election cycle. No matter which side of this debate you are on, we invite you to participate in the discussion. Snacks will be served. Lambda Law Society is open to all members of the Law Center who embrace the ideals of human and civil equality for the gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and transgendered community. A right thinking friend of mine emailed the professor this: Professor (Gayness): Am I allowed to come to this to offer my side of this issue? Or would I not be welcomed.....just making sure! Thanks. Obviously he wanted to present the RIGHT side of the issue; promoting family values etc. This was the response by the professor: I believe that this event it open to the entire law school community, but remember that the organization says: Lambda Law Society is open to all members of the Law Center who embrace the ideals of human and civil equality for the gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and transgendered community. This is discriminatory on its face and subject to strict scrutiny! There are always lectures at school that people attend even if they don’t “embrace” the ideology of the speaker. Cleary, they know that their argument of “family values” is a weak one and they know they won’t be able to handle opposition because they don’t have a leg to stand on. Another proof of the gay hypocrisy; only those that agree with them are welcome. Yet, if we were to have Heterosexual Law Society, Heterosexual Pride Parade, Heterosexual Pride Day etc., the gays would be up in arms; screaming and yelling discrimination. Oh right its only discrimination if it’s against them but not against us.
I am sick and tired of this. In Lawrence v. Texas the Court in essence held that the government doesn’t belong in our bedrooms. A motto supported by the gay community. Yet, once again they are hypocrites because they want the government to give them marriage licenses. I have one thing to say, if you don’t want the government in your bedroom, don’t bring your bedroom into government (the streets). The day we have a heterosexual pride parade/ day/ law society, will be the day I won’t mind that the homos want to have their slew of events. Fair is fair? Isn’t it about equality? Isn’t their claim “if they can marry, we should be allowed to marry…” So I say if they can march, we can march…
Last Monday we got an email from the school telling us to go to this “minority” picnic sponsored by a prominent law firm in South Florida. This is what the email stated: “All minority students should take advantage of this opportunity, so I hope you will please spread the word to all black, Hispanic, women, Asian and students with disabilities, as well as any other minorities you can identify at (insert name of Law School here). Mind you, when the military has a recruiter anywhere on the 300+ acre campus, the law school hangs an enormous banner as well as large posters around the school stating that the law school doesn’t promote or endorse any employer who discriminates on the basis of race, religion and sexual orientation. (I need to find a document with the actual text, it’s really despicable). This is all based on the military’s don’t ask, don’t tell policy. Yet, they are promoting this minority picnic, which clearly discriminates against white males. Oh right, its not discrimination when white males are excluded because they had it good enough all these years. Hello??? This is South Florida; white males are the minority here.
Then there was Tuesday there was a table set up in school by the gay mafia all about the military’s policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” So of course I went to the table and told the fella's a few things that were on my mind. Number one “you lose credibility if you misrepresent the opposing party,” the policy is Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue. Of course that would ruin their bias and their argument. The second thing I told them is that if they aren’t going to join the military, why do they care whether or not gays can be flaming in the military or not. After all, there are many Sabbath observing Jews who will not work for a company who is not flexible in allowing their employees go home before sundown on Friday. If this is the case at a particular company, a Sabbath observor simply would not work there. Yet, it is rare that you see boycotts of those companies by Jewish groups. You don’t work in an environment that doesn’t suit your needs and comfort level. If you are a flame, don’t join the military. End of story! The third issue I pointed out to them is that the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy is for THEIR OWN protection. Since most of the country, especially those who serve in the military are men and women of faith who believe in God and believe in the passage in Leviticus 18:22: “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” Just as strongly the gay mafia believes in their message. The people of faith serving this country believe that God deems homosexuality as an abomination. Yet, it is only “insensitive” or “intolerant” for the military personnel to show any sort of ambivalence with homosexuals serving with them and completely permissible for the homosexual community to belittle and undermine the beliefs of the religious community (see Rosie O’Donnell’s 9/11 rant on The View).
On Wednesday I was informed that it was National Coming Out Day. Try as I might I could not find it on the U.N.’s calendar of all holidays under the sun. Thus, another email was sent out to all the students: “Lambda Law Society celebrates: National Coming Out Day! Today, October 11th Since 1987, October 11 has been National Coming Out Day, a day to promote awareness of the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered community. But Coming Out is not just an emotional process for the person coming out. It also affects those close to them. So for the first time in the history of National Coming Out Day, the Human Rights Campaign is offering the straight community a downloadable guide to Coming Out:"The guide walks people through the emotional spectrum that people typically feel after someone comes out to them, outlines myths and facts about GLBT people, and gives easy ways for straight people to learn more and demonstrate their support for GLBT Americans."” Do heterosexual's have "coming out" day? Or "coming in" day? Or any day?
On Friday, I received this email: Lambda Law Society, presents our October Social! Friday, October 13th, from 7:30 to 9:30 At the home of Prof. (name of professor)Drop by for a selection of adult and light beverages, as well as hors d'oeuvres. Again, I don’t subscribe to this organization. I have no interest in it. Keep my mailbox clean of this junk.
Today is Monday, lo and behold; guess what was in my inbox? Yup, another email from Lambda: Lambda Law Society presents Marriage & Family Equality
A Discussion with Prof. (same gay professor who hosted the social) Tuesday, October 17th, 4:15pm - 5:15pm Faculty Study; how do you feel about gay marriage? Gay adoption? Did you know that starting in the Anita Bryant era; Florida became the only state to expressly prohibit, in its statutes, gays from adopting? The United States Supreme Court's refusal to hear an appeal on the issue in 2005 has opened the door to more states instituting such bans. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of children are waiting for loving homes. Did you know that an anti-gay marriage coalition is close to getting the Florida Marriage Protection Amendment on the 2008 ballot? The Law Center's resident expert on these issues will lead a discussion on these hot topics, as we head into what is becoming an interesting state and national election cycle. No matter which side of this debate you are on, we invite you to participate in the discussion. Snacks will be served. Lambda Law Society is open to all members of the Law Center who embrace the ideals of human and civil equality for the gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and transgendered community. A right thinking friend of mine emailed the professor this: Professor (Gayness): Am I allowed to come to this to offer my side of this issue? Or would I not be welcomed.....just making sure! Thanks. Obviously he wanted to present the RIGHT side of the issue; promoting family values etc. This was the response by the professor: I believe that this event it open to the entire law school community, but remember that the organization says: Lambda Law Society is open to all members of the Law Center who embrace the ideals of human and civil equality for the gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and transgendered community. This is discriminatory on its face and subject to strict scrutiny! There are always lectures at school that people attend even if they don’t “embrace” the ideology of the speaker. Cleary, they know that their argument of “family values” is a weak one and they know they won’t be able to handle opposition because they don’t have a leg to stand on. Another proof of the gay hypocrisy; only those that agree with them are welcome. Yet, if we were to have Heterosexual Law Society, Heterosexual Pride Parade, Heterosexual Pride Day etc., the gays would be up in arms; screaming and yelling discrimination. Oh right its only discrimination if it’s against them but not against us.
I am sick and tired of this. In Lawrence v. Texas the Court in essence held that the government doesn’t belong in our bedrooms. A motto supported by the gay community. Yet, once again they are hypocrites because they want the government to give them marriage licenses. I have one thing to say, if you don’t want the government in your bedroom, don’t bring your bedroom into government (the streets). The day we have a heterosexual pride parade/ day/ law society, will be the day I won’t mind that the homos want to have their slew of events. Fair is fair? Isn’t it about equality? Isn’t their claim “if they can marry, we should be allowed to marry…” So I say if they can march, we can march…
Saturday, October 14, 2006
Where Is My Party?
I think it’s high time we have a REAL third party. The two party system was great when there were actually differences between the two parties. Now we have one party that’s for high taxes and the other is for higher taxes. One party claims they have a plan for Iraq, although its not working that well. The other party claims to have a plan for Iraq, but hasn’t told anybody what it is yet. Both parties are riddled with scandals and cover ups and cover ups of the cover ups. While the Republican Party was once a party who claimed virtue and family values it has now become the party of corruption and shame and thus no different than their counterparts on the other side of the isle. Thus, in essence there really is only one party.
Hence, it is time for the lazy Libertarians to come out of hiding and take advantage of this chaos and get organized. If there was an active third party, it would prevent our representatives from becoming complacent. I think that the GOP has become too comfortable with their majority over the last number of years and feel they are invincible. It is time to show them that they represent the people and not vice versa.
The purpose of the government is to protect and defend this great country of ours. (See Article 1 § 8, United States Constitution). Since we are in a time of war and the most important issue of this era is keeping this country and our allies around the world safe from the Islamo – Nazis who wish to destroy us. They don’t care if we have gay marriage or not; if we abort unborn babies before they are born or not; if we believe in privatizing social security or not; if we believe in lower taxes or not; if we believe that the United States needs to build a wall on our southern border or not. They want to kill us if we vote red, blue or green.
Over the past few weeks the media has made us come to believe that the GOP has fallen apart at its core, which may or may not be the case. They have led the public to believe that a congressman having a sex chat with a sixteen year old boy is the worst catastrophe that this country has faced in decades. Whether the IM chats were a prank staged by the page or not, its over, he is gone. Next. Bob Ney admitted he is a crook and took bribes from Jack Abramoff. He was just taking a page out of Congressmen William Jefferson’s (D-La) handbook. (Jefferson is still in Congress) Ney probably had no more room in his freezer. Next. By the way, has Sandy Berger ever been punished for shoplifting at the National Archives? I think negative.
Thank god I still have somewhat of a thinking brain after spending all this time in law school (where moral relativity is the order of the day). I can ignore the media, I can ignore the scandals and I can ignore the corruption. I can’t ignore the nuclear bomb, I can’t ignore the suicide bombers, I can’t ignore bombs in pizzerias or discothèques, I can’t ignore the sound of mothers crying for their children who were murdered at the merciless hands of the Islamo – Nazis. Thus, my vote will go to the party, albeit a bit bedraggled right now, who at least claims to be strong in fighting this vicious enemy and take the fight to them. My vote will not go to the party who wants to take the enemy for Starbucks.
Hence, it is time for the lazy Libertarians to come out of hiding and take advantage of this chaos and get organized. If there was an active third party, it would prevent our representatives from becoming complacent. I think that the GOP has become too comfortable with their majority over the last number of years and feel they are invincible. It is time to show them that they represent the people and not vice versa.
The purpose of the government is to protect and defend this great country of ours. (See Article 1 § 8, United States Constitution). Since we are in a time of war and the most important issue of this era is keeping this country and our allies around the world safe from the Islamo – Nazis who wish to destroy us. They don’t care if we have gay marriage or not; if we abort unborn babies before they are born or not; if we believe in privatizing social security or not; if we believe in lower taxes or not; if we believe that the United States needs to build a wall on our southern border or not. They want to kill us if we vote red, blue or green.
Over the past few weeks the media has made us come to believe that the GOP has fallen apart at its core, which may or may not be the case. They have led the public to believe that a congressman having a sex chat with a sixteen year old boy is the worst catastrophe that this country has faced in decades. Whether the IM chats were a prank staged by the page or not, its over, he is gone. Next. Bob Ney admitted he is a crook and took bribes from Jack Abramoff. He was just taking a page out of Congressmen William Jefferson’s (D-La) handbook. (Jefferson is still in Congress) Ney probably had no more room in his freezer. Next. By the way, has Sandy Berger ever been punished for shoplifting at the National Archives? I think negative.
Thank god I still have somewhat of a thinking brain after spending all this time in law school (where moral relativity is the order of the day). I can ignore the media, I can ignore the scandals and I can ignore the corruption. I can’t ignore the nuclear bomb, I can’t ignore the suicide bombers, I can’t ignore bombs in pizzerias or discothèques, I can’t ignore the sound of mothers crying for their children who were murdered at the merciless hands of the Islamo – Nazis. Thus, my vote will go to the party, albeit a bit bedraggled right now, who at least claims to be strong in fighting this vicious enemy and take the fight to them. My vote will not go to the party who wants to take the enemy for Starbucks.
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Holistic Massage
Today I got a holistic massage (on my back - hameivin yavin - those who know, will understand :) ) and boy am I hurtin. It looks like the masseus beat me up. My back is completely black and blue. I hope I feel better in the morning. I need to go in the hot tub!
Are we supposed to feel sorry for these women?
When I read stories like this I ask myself, are women really that dumb/naïve/stupid? Everyone is entitled to make a mistake or two about choosing a mate. There are some things that are not obvious about the other person immediately, but by the time you marry someone you tend to figure out the basic 411 about your chosen spouse. Some of the basic info you may want to be somewhat well versed before the nuptials: what religion the spouse practices (if any), what kind of relationship the future spouse has with his family, even meeting a sibling or parent would be ideal; where the spouse lives – going to visit the spouse a couple of times in their own environment is optimal; how is your future spouse employed – make sure its not something vague like import/export. These are just the basics one should have some slight knowledge about before running to the alter. One may also want to look for red flags, such as a person who has a parole officer, someone who has a new job every two weeks, someone who is not allowed to have a credit card in his name or doesn’t have a checking account, someone who is uninsurable, someone with a full medicine cabinet and someone who has any kind of attorney on a retainer. All in all, even though our relationships don’t always end up as planned, most of us try to use some parts of our brain in choosing a mate.
These women use NO part of their brain. In an era where news travels faster than the speed of light, where any iota of information a person is seeking is at his fingertips in seconds there is no reason whatsoever why a Jewish girl from Ashdod married a Palestinian man from Tul Karem. No excuses, period! Maybe 25-30 years ago, I can see where one could have been misled. But nowadays? Nowadays, when the stories about how women are treated in the Islamic culture, especially in the PA controlled areas are almost headlines worldwide, they are subjects of UN resolutions. How an Israeli girl can marry a married Palestinian is beyond me.
Tell me I am too harsh, unsympathetic and heartless. I don’t care. If someone doesn’t care about themselves, why should I care about them! If she didn’t have the common sense to find out the basics – like the fact HE WAS A MUSLIM, or he WAS MARRIED is not my problem. I don’t care about how poor and ignorant she was or that it was love at first sight. There are just some basic things you find out about a person before you committing your life to them. If she couldn’t do it for herself, why should people risk their lives getting her out of her self made disaster? As the saying goes don’t get yourself into shit, if you can’t get yourself out of it.
So, again I ask, do I need to feel sorry for these women?
These women use NO part of their brain. In an era where news travels faster than the speed of light, where any iota of information a person is seeking is at his fingertips in seconds there is no reason whatsoever why a Jewish girl from Ashdod married a Palestinian man from Tul Karem. No excuses, period! Maybe 25-30 years ago, I can see where one could have been misled. But nowadays? Nowadays, when the stories about how women are treated in the Islamic culture, especially in the PA controlled areas are almost headlines worldwide, they are subjects of UN resolutions. How an Israeli girl can marry a married Palestinian is beyond me.
Tell me I am too harsh, unsympathetic and heartless. I don’t care. If someone doesn’t care about themselves, why should I care about them! If she didn’t have the common sense to find out the basics – like the fact HE WAS A MUSLIM, or he WAS MARRIED is not my problem. I don’t care about how poor and ignorant she was or that it was love at first sight. There are just some basic things you find out about a person before you committing your life to them. If she couldn’t do it for herself, why should people risk their lives getting her out of her self made disaster? As the saying goes don’t get yourself into shit, if you can’t get yourself out of it.
So, again I ask, do I need to feel sorry for these women?
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
Columbia's Freedom of Speech 101
On Wednesday, the College Republicans at Columbia University (who knew they existed!) hosted the Jim Gilchrist founder of the Minutemen Project to address the students at Columbia about their work securing our southern border with Mexico. Moments after the after he began speaking, a group of students bolted onto the stage with banners stating “Say No to Racism” and other such hyperbole (some of which were in Arabic).Tonight on Hannity and Colmes, two of the students who barged onto the stage were interviewed, besides for being obnoxious and disrespectful to both Hannity and Colmes, they completely exposed Columbia University for who they really are (not that it is a secret). One would think that after Edward Said and Columbia Unbecoming and now this fiasco, Columbia would attempt to instill a positive image of the University to the public. The students on H&C tonight were complete and utter fools. They admitted that Freedom of Speech and open debate on controversial issues are vital for society, especially on college campuses. These dumb fools lost any credibility for themselves when they started to justify their barging on stage which brought the event to a close. Furthermore, in their squeaky voices they kept saying to H&C “Are you going to let us speak about the horrors going on at the border or are you going to keep cutting us off,” does anyone say payback??? I have to say one thing to these bitches; don’t dish it, if you can’t take it. It was okay to stop someone else from speaking but not okay when someone wanted to stop them from speaking. Columbia has enough to be ashamed of and now they have two more reasons.This was gross negligence on the part of Columbia not to provide extra security for this event. Columbia knew quite well that this was going to hit a raw nerve with some people. After the attacks of Ann Coulter , David Horowitz and Bill Kristol on college campuses, NOTHING should have been permitted in that auditorium. (When Supreme Court Justice John Stevens spoke at my law school, we were not allowed to have even a pen in the auditorium.) Columbia's still reeling from Columbia Unbecoming wants to publicize a new and imporoved image of tolerance of opposing viewpoints, but doesn’t really want to practice it. Once again, Columbia University fails Freedom of Speech 101.
PS. Columbia only gets away with this because they are a private school. If this would be a public university the lawsuits against them would be endless and they would lose every single one of them.
UPDATE: 10.12.06
This just proves my point. Columbia has not changed and is not interested in changing. They have an agenda and they will not veer from their radical leftist path. Thanks M for the article!
PS. Columbia only gets away with this because they are a private school. If this would be a public university the lawsuits against them would be endless and they would lose every single one of them.
UPDATE: 10.12.06
This just proves my point. Columbia has not changed and is not interested in changing. They have an agenda and they will not veer from their radical leftist path. Thanks M for the article!
Thursday, October 05, 2006
A Ramadan Law I'm Sure You Haven't Heard of....
This article was funny. The talkbacks at the end were hysterical.
